Of course, we may say that in today's China, rent-seeking power, resource monopoly and the gap between the rich and the poor are still prominent or even serious. But we should all see that we are gradually reining in the worsening trend of polarization. Regardless of the continued crackdown on institutionalized rent-seeking corruption, It is also a tightening of regulations on the greedy platform-level commercial institutions that monopolize social resources. And the conclusion of the battle against poverty all show the world that we are fulfilling the basic tasks of the people's government. This is the ultimate intellectual power of the real Chinese civilization. Westerners do not understand it temporarily because time has not come to that moment. When Westerners find that an increasingly powerful Chinese civilization has been patronizing all the nations outside the Chinese civilization without the will of any other nation. A world dominated by hegemonism that once only recognized the "zero-sum game" has been completely turned over.

Among the driving factors of these civilized forces, the land ownership system, the separation of ownership rights, contract rights and management rights, and the dynamic balance of checks and balances are the examples of today's China in eliminating the disparity between the rich and the poor in the governance of the world's largest country. As long as the people of a country (farmers) do not lose land resources, the extreme disparity between the rich and the poor can be fundamentally eliminated and mankind can get rid of the cycle of suffering in history. That kind of urban slums after urbanization, in fact, in the final analysis is caused by the privatization of land, slum dwellers, are lost land resources of the proletarian. In my opinion, when it comes to the decisive factor of land ownership, human beings must have higher wisdom to provide different solutions. Currently, China has provided a dynamic balance scheme that can be continuously tracked, which may not be the best, but is certainly the most effective one among the national land systems so far.

Let's go back to the subject logic that I want to express, the land policy of a country, determines the nature of a country, whether the country belongs to the minority or the majority. In history, there is no uniform standard for the level of national governance. However, we can still find three major forces at the level of national governance to evaluate whether national governance can bring peace and security to the country. These three forces are political power, social power and capital power. In the peaceful and prosperous times of political harmony, peace and security, these three forces must be in a dynamic balance, and the land ownership system should be in the camp of social forces among these three forces. However, in history, land resources almost without exception belong to the royal family or the family of scholar-officials and nobility, so after the imperial power has naturally possessed the supreme political power, In addition, the ownership of land resources is occupied or privatized, which will inevitably lead to serious weakness of social forces. Therefore, in human history, the turbulent turbulent times have become the mainstream, which is caused by the serious imbalance of the three forces.

The privatized land ownership system also leaves room for capital forces to monopolize social land resources. Once capital forces become larger and surpass political forces, the society is bound to enter turbulent times (especially in the Western world today, especially in the United States). Therefore, in history, any period of land policy privatization will inevitably lead to the regularity of the country's land resources to the monopoly of a few people (human nature). Because of humanity, there has been a "loss has insufficient and make up more than" 28 law. This law of humanity is the root of human suffering. In today's Western world, the wealth gap, capital intervention (formerly capital through land control, now control land resources+Finance) and even politics, has been the norm. Some people will say that the gap between rich and poor in China is also accelerating. But our nationalization of land policy, it's like putting a ceiling on the gap between the rich and the poor, and when you reach a threshold, I'm sorry, politics will speak, and you will equalize the rich and poor. That's what you've seen recentlyXXThere is the logic behind the message of being regulated and taken over, and this logic is also the basic logic of doing God's work. The way of heaven is to "make up for the deficiency when there is more than enough." This is the root of the design of China's land policy nationalization system (no longer create landless poor people). However you can contract the right to operate, there is always a "Damocles" sword on your head, which can fall at any time. Let humanity always have a ceiling, dare not make mistakes. This is the current China, why it will eventually move towards the ultimate goal of the people's government decisive factor. Nationalization of land policy is the fundamental national policy to reduce the gap between the rich and the poor, and the most fundamental guarantee that the country's land resources will always belong to the people.

CycloseFocusing on providing company audit, tax declaration, registration, annual inspection, tax planning and other services in Hong Kong, Singapore, Dubai and other regions. Efficient, rigorous, intimate service has been favored by many large state-owned enterprises and listed enterprises.